Rogue Employees CDW Sept 2005
(Click here for the PDF version)
Managing the People Threat
Protecting your business from
insiders is smart business
by Keith Chval
Virtually every piece of data worth stealing is stored electronically. As a result, employers must balance access to information with their responsibility to protect those assets from misuse. While it is difficult to protect electronic assets against the actions of determined insiders, a few common-sense proactive measures can reduce the risk that rogue insiders will be able to compromise your data. At the same time, you can position your enterprise to quickly and effectively respond should such an insider manage to access your data.
Keys to the Kingdom
Insiders pose the second greatest threat to cyber security,
according to the 2004 E- Crime Watch Study, conducted by
CSO magazine, the U.S. Secret Service and the CERT
Coordination Center at Carnegie Mellon University. Among
cyber security experts who responded, 37 percent said hackers
posed the greatest threat, followed closely by 29 percent
who saw insiders as posing the greatest threat.
Let's start by defining what we mean by an insider. An insider is an individual who enjoys a trusted status with your enterprise-a former employee, a current employee, a contractor, a customer or even a vendor acting on motives that are inconsistent with the best interests of your enterprise. The potential motives are many. Yet, regardless of motive, the end result is that a rogue insider is committing acts that jeopardize the livelihoods of you and the other stakeholders of your enterprise.
This is especially true of an information-intensive business.
It's not difficult to imagine the enormous damage to your
enterprise if your customer list disappeared, your competitors
received a copy of your marketing plan, all your files
disappeared or you had to scramble to rebuild your network.
In every case, the impact of all these things can be exponentially
greater than simple lost productivity. In most of these cases,
the
damage would be hard to calculate. Damage to your reputation,
lost revenue and lost opportunities don't even begin to describe
the mess a rogue insider can make.
Because of their trusted status, insiders literally hold the keys
to
the company kingdom. For management, the idea that a single
person can access and control the entire network from a corner
Starbucks anywhere in the world should be a source of great concern.
The first step of the process to protect yourself from the damage
that can be caused by a rogue insider is to identify your key
informational assets, and then systematically determine who
needs to have access to that information and for what purposes.
With this information, you would begin developing and
implementing policies and procedures to provide the necessary
access to that information and the related systems.
Minimize the Human Risk
Many business owners hire new employees and contractors,
and assume that these individuals only have the best of
intentions and are of the highest character. It is important
to hedge your positive assumptions, with the right technology
and the right processes.
Scott Nelson, president of Employee Management Services,
an HR outsourcing company located in Burr Ridge, Ill.,
believes protecting your business from internal threats begins
with common sense. "Write your Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)
down, make sure everyone knows about it and understands it.
An AUP is an agreement between the business and its employees
that outlines the terms of Internet and technology resource
usage and acceptable rules of behavior. Then enforce it with an
even hand," he advises.
In addition, eliminate the expectation of privacy. Let employees
know that you are watching and monitoring what they send and
view. Content filtering, e-mail archiving and even simple reviews
of Internet history can be very useful.
Try to understand what parts of your business are more valuable
than others-work to protect those assets with a combination
of process and technology.
Instituting effective employee due diligence procedures can also
provide your enterprise with an important layer of security.
By protecting your valuable information (assets) and technology
with strong hiring policy and processes, you address both
internal and external threats. In the same way your firewall
protects you from threats from outside traffic, an effective
employment candidate due diligence process, coupled with
periodic post-hire updates, can provide protection from threats
posed by rogue insiders.
Mark J. Neuberger, a partner in the Miami office of Buchanan
Ingersoll PC, goes even further by suggesting that IT
professionals and contractors be interviewed and hired differently
than other employees. "This means their backgrounds are subject
to greater scrutiny when recruiting and selecting," he says.
Extra level of Vigilance
When recruiting IT staff, a heightened level of background and
reference checking should become standard operating procedure.
An important consideration in enhancing the due diligence of
your recruiting process is determining who will conduct the
checks. Avoid the temptation to assign this critical responsibility
to your headhunter. A conflict of interest exists when the person
compensated for the placement is assigned responsibility for
finding reasons not to hire the candidate.
Neuberger advises that once hired, IT employees' activities
and performance be subject to greater degree of vigilance and
scrutiny. "There is nothing illegal with,this kind of differential
treatment so long as the employee understands what is expected
and what will happen if their performance does not conform
to these higher standards.
IT staff should be monitored and reviewed on a regular
basis. Management should maintain a basic understanding
of security processes and should consider a regular security
audit conducted by an objective third party. This process
will show what is on your system, how it is being used and
who is using it. Outside objective help may be needed to
perform the audit and to insure that all security issues are
addressed. Audits reveal the latest vulnerabilities within
your network provide critical checks and balances and
often provide remediation guidance.
In addition, identify and watch for the development of "situational
precursors" that can often foretell future
misconduct by an insider. Most people don't set out to
lead a life of crime or otherwise act in a way that is
dishonorable. Typically, this behavior arises when an
individual sees no acceptable way out of an unanticipated
situation. Examples include financial difficulties, marital
problems or a brush with the law. The trigger may also be
an employment-related issue, or simply something as mundane
as a close associate who leaves the enterprise and entices the
insider to join him or her.
Termination Considerations
Terminations should rarely be an unplanned-for event. A
termination usually comes as a surprise to no one, often foretold
by one or more of the precursor events or circumstances
mentioned above. Similarly, it's most likely not news to anyone
that a termination, and the period leading up to it, is one of
the
most frequent periods of employee misconduct.
To protect your enterprise's digital jewels, you must have in place-and consistently execute-policies and procedures designed to minimize the risk associated with the termination of employment relationships. Naturally, these policies and procedures should be tailored to reflect the varying responsibilities and sensitivities associated with different job functions within your organization.
Perhaps the highest degree of security should be employed
when the individual facing termination is part of the IT
staff. The termination process should include measures
to ensure that, once terminated, an employee no longer
has access to enterprise resources.
The terminated employee's passwords and access codes
should be terminated simultaneous to the employee being
informed of the termination. This will require close
coordination to ensure that a delayed termination meeting
doesn't result in unintended advance notice through
premature access denial. A rogue insider tipped off
to his imminent demise may take that opportunity to
quickly destroy or leak critical enterprise assets prior
to the delayed termination ultimately taking place.
Similarly, make sure that necessary personnel, including
vendors and contractors, have been informed that the
employee is now a former employee and is no longer
entitled access to organizational resources and
information. This can be done in a sensitive way
to avoid undue embarrassment to anyone.
Wrapping It Up
The risks posed by the vulnerabilities inherent in your
technologies cannot be ignored by any enterprise.
Fortunately, there are realistic, cost-effective steps that
enterprises of all sizes can implement that can allow them
to continue leveraging technology while mitigating the
risks. Effective policies and procedures for managing
the insider risk is one such area ripe for attention.
While much of this discussion has focused on an employer /
employee relationship in an IT department, many of the
principles discussed have application to other operational
areas within the enterprise, as well as to insiders other
than employees, as defined earlier. Due diligence,
vigilance for precursor situations and management
of the relationship termination process should be
applied equally to all insiders.
In managing the insider risk to your enterprise's
informational assets, by hoping for the best and
preparing for the inevitable, you can avoid the worst,
and in the process, add value for yourself, your
enterprise and its stakeholders.










